Poster presentations 
International Congress Series 1254 (2003) 399–402
Small cavity mastoidectomy: dry ear and hearing results
P.J.D. Dawes*, M. Leaper
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Keywords: Mastoidectomy; Dry ear; Hearing
*Corresponding author. ENT Department, University of Otago, Dunedin Hospital, 201 Great King Street, Dunedin, New Zealand. Fax: +64-34747956.
E-mail address: [email protected]

Click here for the PDF version

Contents

1. Background
2. Method
3. Results
4. Discussion

1. Background

Paediatric canal wall down mastoidectomy (CWDM) has a reputation for large with cavities 30–44% discharging at times [1, 2, 3]. A 90% dry ear rate is achievable [4, 5]. The factors most likely to produce a dry ear after CWDM are: small cavity, low facial ridge, sealing the mesotympanum and a meatoplasty tailored to cavity size [6]. Cavity size can be minimised by following the disease from the tympanum, superiorly and posteriorly, to its limit [7]. Toner and Smyth [8] reported excellent results using this approach. The senior author prefers small cavity mastoidectomy for management for cholesteatoma/retraction pocket disease (Fig. 1).


Fig. 1. Surgical approach.

2. Method

The senior author's personal surgical database was reviewed for cases of cholesteatoma or discharging retraction pocket in children under sixteen years of age. Demographic data, dry ear rate and hearing at one year were recorded. An ear was considered dry if there was one infection or less per annum.

3. Results

Of 50 children identified, 5 were lost to follow up within 6 months of surgery. Forty-four were examined at 1 year, 32 at 2 years and 20 at 3 years. The age, sex and surgery performed are shown in Table 1. Table 2 gives the dry ear rate. Forty-one children had hearing results available at 1 year and Table 3 shows the postoperative air bone gap presented in 10 dB bins.

Table 1. Age, sex and surgery performed
Primary surgery, n=45
Sex M:F28:17
Age3–15 years (mean 10 years)
 
Procedure
Tympanoplasty13
Epitympanotomy±reconstruction5
Atticoantrostomy2
Modified radical mastoidectomy11
Modified radical mastoidectomy with mastoid tip removal14
Table 2. The dry ear rate
  Dry ear
nn%
1 year444193
2 years323094
3 years252496
Table 3. Postoperative air bone gap presented in 10 dB bins
Hearing at 1 year post-op ABGHearing preservationHearing gainNo attempt at hearing surgeryWhole group
n14111641
0–10 dB4206
11–20 dB74415
21–30 dB34411
>30 dB0189

Three patients had postoperative aural discharge. One because of air cells at the sinodural angle, one due to attic granulation tissue and one due to scarring in the 'attic' region of the cavity creating a new pocket with retained infection. Technical failure was attributable to cholesterol granuloma in two cases, dry perforation in two cases, myringitis in one case and small cavity pearls in one case.

4. Discussion

The philosophy of small cavity mastoidectomy prefers CWD surgery with its better access to the sinus tympani, facial recess and oval window niche ICWM. Cavity size is limited by dissecting from the pocket neck to the extent of the disease. In this way, shallow retraction pockets and small cholesteatomas can be excised without resort to large cavity creation. When the bony defect is limited to atticotomy, this can be sealed with a cartilage graft, the initial open approach providing confidence of disease removal. Large mastoid defects can be reduced by removal of the mastoid tip and shelving of the temporal bone, the adjacent soft tissues collapsing to produce a cavity.

The results shown confirm that this approach produces an acceptable dry ear rate following surgery and that in selected cases good hearing is achievable.

References

[1] R.P. Crellin, J.A. Wilson, D.L. Cowan, Mastoid surgery in childhood, Clinical Otolaryngology 16 (1991) 39–42
(abstract).
[2] R.P. Mills, N.D. Pagham, Management of childhood cholesteatoma, Journal of Laryngology and Otology 105 (1991) 343–345
(abstract).
[3] J. Silvola, T. Palva, Long-term results of paediatric primary one stage cholesteatoma surgery, International Journal of Paediatric Otorhinolaryngology 48 (1999) 101–107
(abstract).
[4] A. Palva, P. Karma, J. Karja, Cholesteatoma in children, Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 103 (1977) 74–77
(abstract).
[5] T.H. Guernier, Open cavity mastoidectomy in children, Advances in Oto-rhino-laryngology 40 (1988) 138–141
.
[6] J. Sade, J. Weinberg, E. Berco, M. Brown, A. Halvey, The marsupialised (radical) mastoid, Journal of Laryngology and Otology 96 (1982) 869–875
(abstract).
[7] J.D.K. Dawes, Epitympanotomy and Tympanomastoidectomy, J. Ballantyne, Robb and Smith Operative Surgery; Ear, 3rd ed. (1976) 56–74 Butterworths
.
[8] J. Toner, G.D. Smith, Surgical treatment of cholesteatoma: a comparison of three techniques, American Journal of Otology 11 (1990) 247–249
(abstract).